There is a great article over at Christian Week (ht to
Scott Williams) that speaks well to the tension between emergent and the established church.
Darryl Dash quotes Alan Roxburn, comparing the relationship between these two tribes as "next-door neighbor's with a high fence built between them independently trying to invite their other neighbor's to different block parties being held on the same Saturday afternoon."
I think that's a pretty good analogy, although I'd point out that it's not just limited to the emergent/traditional relationship. The same dynamic existed in the early 80's when praise and worship, seeker oriented services began spilling south out of South Barrington. The "traditional" at the time didn't much like having a shiny new kid on the block.
Roxburn calls for the two tribes to refocus on the gifts they can give one another.
Emergent embraces the liturgy, art and some of the worship form of the traditional church. It seems very cautious and wary of structure. Or to be more specific "the idolatry of structure, according to my friend
Todd. Yet, some structure is necessary, especially as growth in the community occurs. There is danger in throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Traditional churches are, frankly jealous of the fact that emergent churches have the ability to draw in the young, and specifically young families. They often have facility and resource, but often can't get over the hump of change to design an experience that will draw a new generation.
What I'm mulling is a new paradigm. Not a church within a church... But the church recognizing the gifts and strengths of each part, and partnering together for effectiveness.
I see a few examples of that.
Dan Kimball wrote recently about our need for
'Gandalfs'... mentors in faith and ministry. He mentions the fact that his church is partnered with an "aging congregation," and that they are working together in partnership. I'm not sure what that partnership looks like, but I think it's worth studying.
Perhaps we can emerge from within the existing traditional church, ending with an intergenerational community that embraces all. That, I think, ought to be our goal.